Matasano Security seems to be assuming a different use case than I'm interested in. They assume one wants to use JavaScript cryptography as a substitute for SSL/TLS, while I'm more concerned with secure storage of data in the cloud.
Tuesday, August 21, 2012
JavaScript cryptography considered harmful?
After coming across an article from Matasano Security titled, "JavaScript Cryptography Considered Harmful," I decided to submit a question to the Security Now podcast to get a second opinion on the security of JavaScript cryptography. Here is Steve Gibson's take on the question of secure JavaScript cryptography in episode 365 of his podcast:
Matasano Security seems to be assuming a different use case than I'm interested in. They assume one wants to use JavaScript cryptography as a substitute for SSL/TLS, while I'm more concerned with secure storage of data in the cloud.
Matasano Security seems to be assuming a different use case than I'm interested in. They assume one wants to use JavaScript cryptography as a substitute for SSL/TLS, while I'm more concerned with secure storage of data in the cloud.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Posts
Its strategic location makes it a perfect fast getaway for foreigners with layover flights. Gambling-related money transfers at South Korean banks are intently monitored and suspicious transfers are seized. All of 온라인카지노 those actions are regulated and managed by various authorities ministries. Note that the content on this site shouldn't be thought-about betting advice.
ReplyDelete